I lived with a 28, 50 and 150 for a long time, using 35mm film, and the
20-35mm covers two of those and everything in between, on APS-C
digital. It also produces lovely images so for me it's close to
perfect, though I do miss having an ultra wide option.
On 11/12/2015 6:49 PM, Mark C wrote:
I still have my 20-35 f4 and am waiting to see how it does on the FF
digital. It is a great lens on film and lives in my film bag, where ti
gets regular use. I never warmed to the focal range on the APS-C DSLR's.
Mark
On 11/11/2015 11:54 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Every time I look at a photo I've taken with the FA 20-35mm f4.0,
whether on film or digital, I can't help to thing why couldn't it be
a limited sheathed in machined aluminum rather than plastic...
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
