It depends on what's meant by Silver Halide. A silver Halide process is
pretty much what every one used to produce photographic prints before
Digital and various types of inkjets all but took over. An enlarger or
process camera can make pretty sharp photographic prints, given a good
negative. However I assume that using digital files as a source they're
doing something quite different.
My next thought is, when did inkjet prints become traditional? As
opposed to silver prints which actually are traditional. Damn, now I do
feel old.
On 9/22/2015 6:30 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
While looking for cheap 8x10 prints for my employer I tripped across
sharpprints.com. Their prices of $14.95 for 24 x 36 prints sort of
knocked my socks off. Looking into it a bit further they use a
Chromira Pro Lab silver halide printer. Googling that led me to this
discussion of how they are softer than traditional inkjet prints:
http://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=69349.0
(although it is possible that the technology has improved since that
discussion).
Just curious if anyone has any opinions/experience with Silver Halide prints.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
