I gotta believe that is a typo on the original K-3 specs (it's on the Ricoh page that way also) but both cameras say that there are 24.71 "Total Pixels" so I don't see any way the one would differ from the other. I'd chalk it up to a typo that nobody caught. The K-3 is called a 24.3MP camera most places (as is the K-3 ii)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote: > B&H lists the resolution of the K3-II as 24.35 and the K3 as 23.35 > megapixels. I wonder if that suggests a different sensor, or maybe they were > able to squeeze 1 more megapixel out of the one use by the original K3. > > On 6/2/2015 4:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> >> The K-3II has a lot obvious new features that the K-3 doesn't. Are there >> any significant differences in performance? Is it the same sensor? Are >> there any significant changes to the auto focus? >> >> > > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
