Thanks, Christine!

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> wrote:
> I heartily agree with Stan's recommendations. I love my DA 21. Excellent 
> lens. I very much like my Da 40, but it's a curious lens. It's very sharp and 
>  very light on the camera, which makes it a dream to shoot with. I still, 
> however, think it's wider than it actually is. Sometimes I'm think a bit 
> wider than the lens can accommodate. I don't know why my mind's eye still 
> hasn't made the adjustment. Just me really. Cheers, Christine
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On May 22, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Stanley Halpin <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:I
>>
>> My recommendations will pretty much echo what Jan and Steve and others have 
>> already said.
>> I have the 21mm, 35mm macro, 40mm, and 100mm macro lenses you mention.
>>    - The 21mm is always included in my travel kit.
>>    - The 35mm is pretty much always on one of my cameras.
>>    - I haven’t used the 40mm since I got the 35mm.
>>    - I seldom use the 100 macro any more. I carry it (and an A-50mm) when 
>> hunting flowers etc. but will usually use either the 35mm or 200mm macro. If 
>> I didn’t have the 200mm, I would be using the 100mm most of the time, not 
>> the 35mm.
>>
>> I find 35mm to be too wide a FOV for most macro work but it is a great lens 
>> for near-far compositions (e.g., single flower or cluster of flowers in the 
>> foreground, interesting landscape in the background).
>>
>> So, I wouldn’t buy the 35mm for its macro capability. But it is a wonderful 
>> lens, a joy to shoot with, and the macro aspect is a nice bonus.
>> Of the lenses you’ve mentioned, if you buy only one, I would go with the 
>> 21mm. Image quality may be slightly under that of the 35mm, but it does have 
>> that wider FOV essential for many streetscapes and landscapes. And you 
>> already have the 100 macro.
>>
>> If I were assembling a “minimal” prime-lens kit, it would include 15mm, 
>> 21mm, 35mm macro, 55mm, and 100mm macro. Plus maybe the 300mm for long range 
>> work.
>> If I were assembling a basic kit built around zooms, it would include 
>> 12-24mm, 16-50mm, and 60-250mm. If I didn’t need the reach of the 60-250, I 
>> would be happy instead with the 50-135 + 1.4x telextender.
>>
>> stan
>>
>>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Jan van Wijk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 21 May 2014 12:31:18 -0400 Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OK, if I do acquire a "new to me" K-5II or IIs, I should get a good
>>>> fixed focal length lens to go with it.  Currently, I use the 18-135
>>>> zoom, the 100mm f2.8 macro and the DA 50mm f1.8 with my K-r.
>>>>
>>>> I was looking at the 21mm f3.2 DA AL Limited, the 35mm f2.8 macro
>>>> limited and the  40mm f2.8 DA limited.  Which have people here found
>>>> the most useful and versatile?  Which (if any) do you prefer for image
>>>> quality?
>>>
>>> I have the 21mm and the 35mm macro.
>>>
>>> Both perform well, but I use the 35mm MUCH more than the 21.
>>> Somehow it FOV suits me better, and of course it does 1:1 macro
>>> which is extremely useful for me in the field.
>>>
>>>> I am concerned that the 40 might be too close to the 50 I use now.  Is
>>>> it significantly better in image quality?
>>>>
>>>> I have the 100 macro;  will the 35 macro allow me to do things I can't
>>>> with the 100?  I know the 35 limited is a lot more modern, but I
>>>> really have no complaints about the 100 macro, aside from the shaky
>>>> hand behind the lens.
>>>
>>> Larger FOV, but that is not always an advantage for macro.
>>> It IS an advantage when you want you use it as the only lens ...
>>>
>>> It is one of my sharpest lenses for sure.
>>>
>>> Regards, JvW
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Jan van Wijk;   http://www.dfsee.com
>>> Flickr : jvw_pentax
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to