Thanks Matthew. I wasn't particularly concerned about using a low quality setting because of articles like this that I've seen before. But I did not recall the analysis exposing the 0-100 scale as a gimmick, masking an underlying 0-12 scale. So, oddity explained.
stan On Nov 26, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Stan Halpin > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As I went through a series of trial-and-error settings, I was very surprised >> to find a discontinuity of sorts. >> >> At a quality setting of 70, the file was 305kb as reported by my iMac OS-X >> 10.7.5. >> At a quality setting of 69 the file size dropped all the way to 264kb. > > http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/jpeg-quality > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
