Epson Scan is light years better than VueScan. VueScan's adjustments are 
kludges that have lack any kind of proportion control. I've used it extensively 
and despise it. I know it has a loyal enthusiast following, but I think it's 
undeserved.



On Oct 25, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Epson printers seem fine (I’m printing to two of them) and both my HP 
> printers seem fine too. Epson Scan … Never use it, never installed it; always 
> use VueScan here. 
> 
> G
> 
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 6:52 AM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Why is Epson software always a problem with every new OS? That clinches it 
>> for me: No Maverick in my immediate future. I rely heavily on the Epson scan 
>> software (Vuescan is awful and clunky), and I'd be in deep doo-doo if my 
>> Epson printer balked.
>> 
>> Paul
>> On Oct 25, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 20:26 , Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Has anyone upgraded their Mac to Maverick? Any glitches. It's supposed to 
>>>> speed some things up and has some nice new features. But I'm a little 
>>>> nervous about diving right in on this one. Sounds like a significant 
>>>> change.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I've been running it for a couple of weeks now.  There are only two issues 
>>> I've got.
>>> 
>>> 1. My Epson scanner software reports "You can't use this version of the 
>>> application 'Epson Scan' with this version of OSX".  So I'll need an update 
>>> somehow.  Maybe Epson will provide one?  Hope so.
>>> 
>>> 2. I have a DNS "search domain" issue.  It's odd.  The domain at our 
>>> company is visi.com - so if I want an address of a host here, I can type:
>>> 
>>> host syslog.mn2
>>> 
>>> and it will report:
>>> 
>>> syslog.mn2.visi.com has address 209.98.102.2
>>> 
>>> But if I then type:
>>> 
>>> ssh syslog.mn2
>>> 
>>> It doesn't work.  Instead I get this:
>>> 
>>> ssh: Could not resolve hostname syslog.mn2: nodename nor servname provided, 
>>> or not known
>>> 
>>> So that's kind of a bug - but not a killer!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Other than those two issues, it seems nice.  The upgrade was smooth and 
>>> painless and took less than 1/2 an hour.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to