On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:49:21PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, Bill wrote: > > On 18/07/2013 8:51 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote: > >> > >>And your point is?.... FSM knows I'm *so* not a fan of change for > >>change's sake, but I also think it's bizarre to excuse a state of > >>affairs as "that's the way we've always done it". If people > >>actually do prefer reply-to list, I'm certainly not agitating for > >>change. (And since only one person has specifically expressed a > >>preference for switching off reply-to list, I'll shut up except > >>for addressing any other wrong comments.) > > > > Dude, the beauty of the PDML is that it is a virtual pub, with the > > added beauty that one can participate in several different > > conversations at the same time, and can take a conversation off list > > if it goes off topic. Changing the default to reply to person rather > > than reply to list would result in confusion and suicide. > > Why can't you just leave well enough alone? > > Really? That explains why my other lists have died, then. </sarcasm>
You're not making yourself any friends here, you know. A lot of this people here have been part of this list for many years. The way the list works now has served us well for all that time, and we really don't need somebody telling us how we could do it "better", for some particular personal viewpoint of what "better" might be. "Reply" goes to the list; MIME attachements get the message rejected. (and if your inbox fills up, you get your list account suspended). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
