it wont go for $9 now the list knows about it :)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stan Halpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:41 PM Subject: Re: Russian 645 Lenses > One bid so far, only $9, how could you go wrong? > > I noticed that earlier. Since it is not auto aperture, and since it has such > obvious distortion, I think I will stick with the Pentax 35/3.5 wide angle. > But if you want the quasi fisheye look, hey $9 isn't bad. > > Stan > > > From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 23:47:47 -0500 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Russian 645 Lenses > > > > I guess I should have paid attention when you guys were talking about Russian > > lenses... > > > > Bill forwarded this to me: > > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1342170328 > > > > Also, there's this: > > > > http://www.hartblei.com/ > > > > Anyone have any experience with this stuff? > > > > tv > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
