Quoting [email protected]:
Even though my body is several generations old it does what I need it to do.
Pleased to hear it!
Oh.. and
MARK!!
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
It is rarely the limiting factor in my photos not turning out
(other than focal length limitations, but I could no more afford a
600mm Nikon than I could a Pentax - indeed I'm sure a Pentax 600 is
far more affordable).
If I had money I would not switch systems. I might buy a Fuji x100
or x1 Pro, or were I flush with funds might buy an M9, but those
would supplement my dslr, not replace.
If I had money I would likely buy the current Pentax flagship body,
supplement my lens collection, but I'd stick with Pentax, not out of
loyalty, just because I don't feel a need to switch.
Sometimes it feels like people - oh never mind. I'm just going to
enjoy taking pictures and stop worrying...
:-)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: [email protected]
Sent: December 8, 2012 12/8/12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cameras and Photography
Frankly, Pentax has been dying ever since I joined PDML in 2001.
At various times over the years, on this list, a *majority* would complain
and/or felt it was in serious trouble (the lack of a new camera for years,
company buy outs, etc. A minority always complained.) And some would dump
it at these times and migrate to another brand. Then finally Pentax would
release a new camera or a few new lenses and most would be reassured and
relax.
For such a morbid brand, Pentax's continued existence is rather amazing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
