For me, it was value at the outset. My K-x offered more of what I wanted
at a better price than any of the competing models.
And, since then, I've grown to love using old manual lenses. Pentax
makes sense for me.
If it were about the name for me, I'd have saved up a little longer and
gotten a Canon T2i.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2012 4:57 PM, Tom Cakalic wrote:
THROW BRAND NAME OUT THE WINDOW!
Stop thinking (like me) that because you've been mostly or 100%
Pentax, that you're confined to a brand. That's not true!
Why do you like photography?
Is it because you like to see things?
Is it because you like to share things?
Is that true or not?
In that case, stop thinking that YOUR current BRAND must be PENTAX.
Your 'investment' in the brand is temporal.
Regardless of brand, the excellent image you capture and share is by
far the most important thing you will produce!
Photography is not about brand name.
I write this because I believe, really believe, that Pentax is a dead brand.
Be honest with yourselves. I think Pentax has been, for the last 20
years, the bargain brand. That's why I joined .
,,, 1990.. 2012...
It's not about brand.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
