About two weeks after I got my K20, camera and bigma both fell off my monopod onto asphalt. the bigma didn't seem too much the worse for wear. It's a little stiff for adjusting focal length, but that's not always a bad thing. It tends to stay where I put it. When I was looking at my Jupiter+moon photos, I noticed that the bigma photos weren't as sharp as the tamron adaptall plus two teleconverters. I then remembered that for the past couple of years I've always been a bit disappointed in the sharpness of the photos I got with it. The bigma is supposed to be a fairly sharp lens, but how sharp is "fairly"? I just did some quick and dirty test shots with it, at a variety of ISOs and shutter speeds. Most of these are 1:1 crops, with a couple showing the full frame.
Is my lens tweaked, or am I just looking too closely at the pixels? http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157631529224954/ -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
