That is a widespread misinformation. People who work in galleries &
museums have been told that by their predecessors who got it from their
predecessors and never really considered if it actually makes sense or
has any basis in fact. It's one of those urban legend things like the
alligators living in the sewers of New York City.
Flash has no more effect on the furnishings than does any other natural
or artificial light.
Not everyone who works in museums is completely clueless though. I have
been told, by the rent-a-cops at the museum no less, that flash
photography is not allowed because it interferes with other visitors
enjoying the exhibits.
From: Jack Davis
Was advised by a Hearst's Castle tour guide that flash was banned due
to it's continuous used actually leaching color from tapestries?and
certain other (unidentified) art work materials.
Jack Davis________________________________
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jackdavis
http://www.photolightimages.com/
From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> To: Pentax-Discuss
Mail List <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: The real reasons why flash use is banned in galleries
Bruce Walker wrote:
Comes down to money from tickets and gift shops. And a bit of
superstition. UV is just not a practical concern.
Most revealing ... http://goo.gl/vdxl8
I always assumed flash was banned because it's f*cking inconsiderate
to other people trying to view the art.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
