This one was definitely female. I think.
;-) Have to admit the extreme softness of the photo makes ID that much harder, but I walked right by her and she was almost certainly a she. As I said in the initial post what is unusual about this is the time of day. I've seen "the girls" out after dark, but never so obvious in broad daylight. Also, in our neighbourhood, their dress is rarely this garish. Maybe she's testing out a new location or something... As I'm sure Bruce has noticed, this part of Toronto is an interesting mix. South of Lakeshore Blvd. are nice single family homes with Volvos, BMWs and Audis in the driveway. I'm sure that some of the big homes with waterfront access are valued in the millions. North of Lakeshore? A bit more downscale. Lots of down and outers drinking at sad little restaurants on the strip. And at night, hookers. Sorry, "sex trade workers". Too bad about this photo. The image, the moment was a good one, I thought. However it's way too soft to do anything with, other than show the list and have a few laughs. Which we've done and off to the trash bin of digital history it goes. Thanks for looking. Thanks for commenting. Cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> Sent: June 19, 2012 6/19/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: PESO - Father's Day Surprise On Jun 19, 2012, at 1:33 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > I cannot tell the actual sex of the subject. (I guess you really do have to > spell it out). I got the drift of your comment. First glance at the photo, I thought, "that's a guy." Then again, I have experience in that regard, having been besieged by hookers of questionable gender while waiting in line to get into the Lincoln Tunnel at rush hour. The hookers worked the car lines, going car to car to proposition the driver and sometimes reaching in an open window to grab a little crotch. After one such encounter with a "woman" who needed a shave, I kept my windows rolled up tight. Of course that was in New York's bad old days, before Rudy cleaned up the west side. Paul > > On 6/19/2012 12:49 PM, John Sessoms wrote: >> I have not the slightest idea how that's supposed to relate? >> >> From: "P. J. Alling" >> >>> I can't figure out, ahh, well. Let me tell a small story. Long ago a >>> friend decided he wanted to raise gerbils. He had been given a male >>> gerbil as a gift. So all he needed was a female or two to get >>> started. To make a long story short after purchasing the third male >>> gerbil in a row, I asked what the problem was, and he replied; "It's >>> really difficult to sex a gerbil". So perhaps you understand my >>> problem here. >>> >>> On 6/18/2012 10:16 PM, frank theriault wrote: >>>> Not what I expected to see yesterday afternoon at about 5pm, about 4 >>>> blocks from my place: >>>> >>>> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/06/fathers-day-surprise.html >>>> >>>> I mean we see this stuff at night, but on a Sunday afternoon? The >>>> poor quality stems from the fact this was a one-shot deal. Shot from >>>> the hip (hence the blur). Didn't want some pimp beating the crap out >>>> of me a taking my camera... >>>> >>>> ;-) >>>> >>>> Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> frank >> >> ... and that's an *UGLY* hooker. >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a > lengthly search. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
