I would use the 21mm. Depth of field is going to be more of an issue than 
sharpness when doing a group photo like this, and the wider lens will thus 
better serve you.

Another random thought - take along a 3x5 or 4x6 card with a rectangle cut-out 
in 5x7 proportions: you can use that as a viewing/composition aid when 
arranging the mob of kids so that you don't have a bunch of wasted empty space 
in the frame when you crop and print the 5x7's.

stan

On May 28, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Tim Bray wrote:

> Since the Little League’s “real photographer” is unavailable, I’ve
> been asked to shoot the annual portrait of the 45 “graduating”
> 12-year-old players and get 5x7’s made for them.  Group shot, not
> portraits.  I’ve never done anything remotely like this and if anyone
> here has, advice would be welcome.   Not just cameras but
> composition/procedure/whatever.
> 
> It’ll be on the grass by the traditional-looking scoreboard.
> 
> This will be the K-5.  My thinking is that even if we can squeeze them
> into 3 rows (and it may just be 2), it’s a pretty wide shot. So I’m
> thinking of my wide lenses, the 21mm Limited and 30mm Sigma f1.4.  My
> *sharpest* lenses are the 100mm Macro and 50-135, but I don’t think
> either are gonna work in this scenario.    This is where having the
> 18-55 might be useful...
> 
> Anyhow, any wisdom would be greatly appreciated. -T
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to