On 4/25/2012 11:25 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Comparing that K100D versus a K20D by taking photos of flowers. Who'd do such
a thing?
That's a question I dare not ask myself.
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157616985839165
That's some pretty impressive stuff from both bodies. I've always been
really impressed with the K100D's IQ, and there's just something
intangible about the images it produces -- a certain subtle quality that
I always felt was absent from my K-x's images. I still haven't been able
to quantify it.
(imgp = k100 lrc in the file name = k20)
On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, Frank! ;)
I think the second one was a little more color-faithful to the outer petals.
The first shot probably would have been closer, but I have the saturation
cranked down a bit on the K100D to help preserve detail. I may have gone just a
little too far.
Exposure looks a bit different between the two. You can't do a fair
comparison between the two without using the same lens.
That's very true. I guess I wasn't really going for a head-to-head test
at the time, but when I pulled the images off the cards, I was really
pleased with the K100D's images compared to the K20D's, especially given
the disparities between them, both in the glass (zoom at full reach vs.
50mm prime) and the resolution (6Mp vs. 14Mp). So, I couldn't help
making the comparison.
I just really enjoy shooting with both of them.
-- Walt
--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
