Actually, the exact same size, just heavier. William in Utah.
Peter Alling wrote: > > The M50/1.7 is not noticeably bigger than the M50/2.0 I'd go with the former. > > At 09:03 AM 3/11/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >And an MX with a K35/3.5 or an M50/2.0 *is* pretty much a pocket-sized > >kit <g>. > > > >Mark Roberts wrote: > > > > > An MX with a 43/1.9 is a gerat almost-pocket-sized kit. > > > >-- > >Shel Belinkoff > >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > >http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html > >- > >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
