I have on and I'd have to be 'simple'.
At 08:07 AM 3/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>On Monday, March 11, 2002, at 02:13 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>
>>I can say that I am re-evaluating my assortment of lenses for the
>>35mm. Previously I had been trying to build up the highest optical
>>quality and full range that I could find - regardless of cost. Now
>>I'm thinking of small and lightweight as the 67 covers high quality
>>much better.
>
>My 35mm kit is oriented around two things -- lenses that are significantly
>faster than what I have in 67 (there's nothing slower than f2.8 in my 35mm
>kit now), and size. I'm semi-actively seeking an M series 50mm f1.4 in
>good shape to replace the one that, uh, had an unfortunate accident a
>while ago. Was there an M series 35mm f2.0? I'd be up for one of those, too.
>
>Actually, if anyone has either of those and wants to trade for a Pentax
>2X-S in great shape (but no caps or box) or the dreaded M 28mm f2.8, drop
>me a line.
>
>-Aaron
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
