The MX is not expensive, rugged, small, and a lot of extras are still available...you would not be sorry with one.
Dave -- David Spaulding Photographer http://d.spaulding.tripod.com > From: gfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:36:09 -0500 (EST) > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: LX vs MX vs KX (was Re: I want LX!) > > I'm considering another body to add to my collection (actually, to replace > the ZX-50, which gets passed on to a friend). > > The LX is out of the question. I'm not spending that much, but I notice > people continually chatting up the KX and the MX, and was wondering which > one people tend to prefer. I was intrigued by some messages in the best > body thread going around that the KX has got all the features of the LX, > except for the metering. > > Any have some input? Oh, wait.. I know you all have some input, so does > anyone want to share some input? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
