M 35/2.0? Yep! Was my most used lens back in the old days. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:07 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: OT: Oh, I get it... > On Monday, March 11, 2002, at 02:13 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > > > > I can say that I am re-evaluating my assortment of lenses for the > > 35mm. Previously I had been trying to build up the highest optical > > quality and full range that I could find - regardless of cost. Now > > I'm thinking of small and lightweight as the 67 covers high quality > > much better. > > My 35mm kit is oriented around two things -- lenses that are > significantly faster than what I have in 67 (there's nothing slower than > f2.8 in my 35mm kit now), and size. I'm semi-actively seeking an M > series 50mm f1.4 in good shape to replace the one that, uh, had an > unfortunate accident a while ago. Was there an M series 35mm f2.0? I'd > be up for one of those, too. > > Actually, if anyone has either of those and wants to trade for a Pentax > 2X-S in great shape (but no caps or box) or the dreaded M 28mm f2.8, > drop me a line. > > -Aaron > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
