----- Original Message ----- From: Aaron Reynolds Subject: Re: Consume yourself happy with instant gratification (WAS: Silly Photo.net thread)
> On Sunday, March 10, 2002, at 08:22 PM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote: > > > The original snippy remark applied to Vivitar and Kiron lenses with > > Konica > > mounts. Aside from the Series 1 lenses, Vivitar lenses along with Kiron > > are > > best known for being inexpensive. If they have Konica mounts, they're > > probably > > older than a number of members on this list. My assumption was that > > they were > > probably cheap, old lenses. > > Perhaps this would be easier to understand for me if you could give me a > sampling of the ones you've used that were optically poor. After all, > your assumption is based on having used at least one of them, right? I had a Vivitar 135mm f/2.8 lens that was so bad I took the glass out of it and made a flower pot out of. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
