On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The church steeple at Mission Santa Cruz is quite picturesque, and because
> of that dynamic range thing, damn near impossible to photograph at night.  I
> was driving into Santa Cruz last night, just a touch after sundown, the sky
> was glowing a pretty shade of blue, not too much darker than the steeple.
> From where I first saw it, there were also some pretty clouds in the
> background.  By the time the stoplight had changed, I'd found a place to
> park etc. the sky had already darkened past peak.  I didn't have any lenses
> with me long enough to photograph it from where I could put the pretty
> clouds in the background either.
>
> Here's what I did manage to get:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7018377935/in/set-72157629673999061/
>
> Which I think is the better composition. Of the four attempts I posted,
> this is the other likely
> composition:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6872272564/in/set-72157629673999061/
>
> I did do some bracketed shots, so in theory I could do HDR on them to
> bring out details.
>
>
> Comments? Suggestions? Preferences?

I'd suggest a different tack. More steeple, less foliage. Portrait
orientation, frame the steeple with foliage. I noted a possible crop
onto LRC45282.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6872272564/in/set-72157629673999061/

BTW, in defense of Flickr: can SmugMug or Photo.net do that?
Collaborative crops? ;-)

--
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to