Was there a camera in that picture?

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Walt Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/9/2012 12:59 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
>>
>> On 9 February 2012 15:16, P. J. Alling<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe because they couldn't even photograph it to look like a Spotty, it
>>> was
>>> grossly huge by comparison and looked ungainly.
>>>
>>> The i10 on the other hand was about as ordinary a P&S as you could find.
>>>  In
>>> fact Kodak had a model that had exactly the same specifications
>>> silhouette
>>> and control placement.  Probably made in the same factory.  The only
>>> difference was that it had Kodak emblazoned on it and sold for half the
>>> price.
>>>
>>>
>> I can't argue about the 50th Anniversary DSLR's ungainly looks.  The
>> Spotmatic is a difficult camera to emulate.  Its proportions are
>> delicately poised on the boundary of elegance and awkwardness.  The
>> arched ridge at the front seemed dated even in the sixties, in
>> juxtaposition to its otherwise clean, simple lines.
>>
>> As for the I-10, it's a good thing that Pentax got the retro bug out
>> of its system with an unimportant model.  That allowed the Q to go
>> ahead with a fresh new style.  It's a gem of a camera, which it
>> wouldn't have been with the I-10's dumpy, dated appearance.
>>
>> Sixties/seventies retro might work for Olympus, whose great style
>> statement and lasting image was the OM series (along with the Trip
>> which they also rebirthed), but I honestly can't see it working for
>> Pentax.  While it has several landmark camera series in its history
>> from a fans POV, none of them really stand out as design icons.
>>
>> But if Pentax were to go down Nostalgia Road, my vote would be split
>> between the MX for being the sleekest Pentax, the KX for being the
>> most handsome Pentax, and the K2 for being the sexiest Pentax.  Sorry
>> LX, you're OK looking but a little bland.
>>
>> regards, Anthony
>>
>>    "Of what use is lens and light
>>     to those who lack in mind and sight"
>>                                                (Anon)
>
> As sleek & sexy go, I have to say Argus would make an excellent candidate:
>
> http://is.gd/6JJBhx
> <http://shopping-park.info/Stuff%21/tpl/uploads/amanda-bynes-hd-hq-wallpapers-images-pics-9999947.jpg>
>
> -- Walt
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to