On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:42:38AM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote: > On 2011-02-26 2:51, John Francis wrote: > > > >It's an IPS display, which probably counts for something, right? Anyway, > >I reckon it has to be an improvement over the regular screen on my Compaq. > >And the price is right - it's coming courtesy of my employer. I pretty much > >had to get a second screen to debug some full-screen graphics stuff I'm > >working on, and I persuaded them that it made more sense to get this one > >than a regular 1920x1080, or even the lower-spec HP 1920x1200 non-IPS one. > > I haven't used that one, but it seems to be a replacement for the > one I have, which is the HP LP2475w. I've had it for a couple or > three years and it's been an excellent monitor. I keep it > calibrated with a Spyder 3 and get excellent closed-loop printing > results. The colors are rich and vibrant. It was almost shocking > when I first got it, since I'd only had TN monitors before.
SO what you're saying is that I should go out and buy a Spyder? Funny how "free" enablement always ends up costing real money :-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
