On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:29 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > The funny part is that I really couldn't tell the"legs" photo was in a > dark spot. Not at all. That's why I wondered about your motivation > for iso 3200. Any serious noise reduction?
No noise reduction applied in processing. I believe the camera noise reduction for high iso is set to "auto" in custom functions. I don't know if it's applied to RAW files or just jpegs. I intend to experiment with different settings at some point. Haven't even read most of the manual yet:-). Paul > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I went with 3200 because I wanted to reach the darker corners of the coffee >> shop without changing the ISO. But I also wanted to reaffirm my initial >> impressions regarding high ISO performance with the camera. The lady with >> the legs -- the first url below -- was in a fairly dark spot. I think the >> exposure was f4.5 at 1/100th or so. And the focal length was 70mm, so it was >> a logical choice, although I probably could have gotten away with ISO 1600. >> The mom and baby were in pretty good light. I think the exposure was >> something like f4.5 at 1/300th. (I'm not on my work computer now, so I can't >> be sure, but that's in the ballpark.) >> Paul >> On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: >> >>> I originally missed the 3200 part. Clearly 3200 is not longer a >>> desperation setting. Just curious: were you just trying out the >>> camera or using 3200 for the Tv with a longer lens? >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:20 PM, P N Stenquist <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> It's winter in Michigan, so I'm back at the coffee shop now and then. A >>>> couple pics from this afternoon. Both with the K5 and DA* 60-250. Both at >>>> (S) 3200 and f4.5. Window light. The leggy lady is full frame. The mom and >>>> baby is cropped to about 2.3 f frame because a chair was in the way. >>>> Experimented a bit with autofocus on the street. I'm pleased. Considerably >>>> better than K7. >>>> >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11905710 >>>> >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11905711 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Steve Desjardins >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
