It is an interesting combination. Even on my rather pedestrian K7, iso 1600, FA50 1.4, a few stops of SR, and that Borgish green focus light makes me wonder if the only reason I need light anymore is so I can see to frame the shot.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Jeffery Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed. A couple more quantum leaps in noise control and maybe we can > relegate "anti-shake" to the history books. Just set the shutter speed at > 1/8,000. > > Jeffery > > > On Nov 2, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >> iso 12800. I find it amazing that you even get a usable image, and >> that one is pretty good. The portrait is a bit noisy full crop, but >> looks fine as a normal image. >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Paul: Looks good. I'm VERY interested in low light auto focus >>> performance of the K5. Would very much like to hear your views on this >>> topic. Cheers, Christine from Chicago >>> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
