Oh, then it is no issue - DA* 50-135/2.8 would seem to be your best
option among those at hand.
Boris
On 11/2/2010 3:53 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
The Zuiko isn't very fast, so I've used it outdoors for the most part. Indoors,
I'd probably have to go with 5.6 at the largest.
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:12 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
If 50-200 Zuiko is fast (like f/2.8), then it could be preferable because
ultimately it will give you even closer reach. If you decide to go with K-7, I
suggest a battery grip that may help your steadiness.
On 11/2/2010 5:13 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I have been using faster lenses (77/1.8) for stage productions until
now, but want to get a bit closer with a zoom. Do any of you who have
this lens feel that it will focus reliably in sometimes dim stage
lights with a K-7? Because of the added length, I'm taking a Porter
bean bag to use as a rest.
What ISO do I dare use indoor under incandescent lighting from
floods? I'm shooting it entirely RAW, so I can fiddle with color
correction later on the Mac.
What say you? Feedback from the intelligentsia is welcomed, gas-baggy
or not, whoopee cushion or not, and I won't criticize your reading
ability. My only other long telephoto choices are 70-200 2.8 Sigma
(10 years old), or a 50-200 Zuiko that I got with my E-1 (but I can
use it on my more recent Panasonic.
Jeffery Smith About to photography Bat Boy, like my reputation
depends on it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
