On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:05 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 21, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > >> On 21/05/2010, Adam Maas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The K-7 pretty much nailed everything I wanted fixed about earlier >>> Pentax DSLR's except the high ISO performance, which wasn't good >>> enough to get me to upgrade. >>> >>> I still want a K-7x, the K-x is a great little body but the K-7's VF, >>> build and sealing and LiIon batteries would be a big upgrade for me, I >>> just need K-x level high ISO from it. >> >> I'm pretty much in the same boat, really I can't justify the purchase >> of a K7 when the K-x K20D combo will do pretty much all I need for the >> moment. >> > After 15,000 K7 frames, I'd be really bummed if I had to shoot with my K20 > again. And a Kx doesn't have the battery or frame rate horsepower I need. Not > to mention a viewfinder that's acceptable for manual focus. > Paul
Paul, K-x is 4.7fps, K-7 is 5.2fps. Only real difference is buffer depth. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
