Hmmm...
as a K10D owner I find this disturbing, doe sthis mean I need a ne wcamer ?
sound like it.
Keep the reports coming Charles this is the sort of specific compaison I am
interested in.
Phil Northeast
Hobart, Tasmania
www.northeastmedia.biz
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Robinson" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:22 AM
Subject: K7 first thoughts
Coming from the K10D, which I thought was leaps and bounds above the DS2
in performance, I have to say... the K7 is:
1. MUCH faster. Think about taking a shot and it's already focused, shot,
and on the card.
2. MUCH quieter. The shutter is more of a "fwoosh" than the ClicketyWHACK
of the K10D
3. A BIT smaller. Almost DS2-sized. The side-by-side photos of it
against the K20/K10 don't really give you a sense of that.
4. WAY better at exposure. I went out at lunch today to try and "fool the
meter" and was 100% unsuccessful. Even when I pointed it right at the sun
at 16mm. Yow.
I'm very very happy. I already wonder how long I'll be holding onto the
K10D as a "backup" because it already looks.... less-than-desireable to
me.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
