Well if you know nothing about photography at all there is a clue here I think. It has nothing do to with photo technique. I'll write Shel privately to see if I'm right. And as a couple of others pointed out already, they are both digital now. :)
annsan (I don't want to blast my idea to the whole list to spoin fun but if you must know or came to same conclusion for same reason let me know OFF list ) Peter Alling wrote: > > Very true. > > At 10:34 PM 1/24/2002 -0600, you wrote: > >On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:42:04 -0800, you wrote: > > > > >I am sure all here will immediately be able to tell which is the > > >digitally captured image. > > > > > > >They've both been digitally captured. Else one could not see them on > >the web. > > > >-- > >John Mustarde > >www.photolin.com > >- > >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
