Had an almost new one, at the same time I had a F 35-70 3.5~4.5 and a FA
28-70 4.0.
I still have the 35-70. (I'd like to find it a new home, I don't use it
enough, but they're so inexpensive it's hardly worth it).
I found a replacement 28-70 when the rear aspheric element separated.
I got rid of the 35-80 as fast as I could.
On 5/4/2010 2:56 AM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
I'd been buying several older FA lenses and Samsung's D-series lenses
recently. Found good deal for FA 35-80mm f/3.5-5.6 tele-zoom. What can
you say about it? I can't find many larger sample images to see what
it's about in pictures...
Your comments highly appreciated,
________________________________________________________________________
K20D, DA 10-17, D-XENON 18-55, DA* 16-50, FA 50 F1.4, DA 50-200,
ELINCHROM, BOWENS
more @ roman.blakout.net | roman.4models.info
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
