Four flower photos, uncropped and a tight crop, taken with DA40 +
Raynox 250 on the K-x:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157623954147830/
One shows motion blur from the breeze.
Quick impressions:
I have no complaints about the sharpness, especially for the price. I
haven't entirely sorted out carrying it about, but the 49-43mm adapter
works just fine, and I don't have to worry about getting dust on my
sensor, as I would changing to a real macro lens. But, it's a lot
smaller than my DFA50/2.8 macro, and on the DA40 a better length for a
walkaround lens. The DA 35 would be handier than a DA40+Raynox250,
but is bigger than the DA40, and costs a lot more than the Raynox.
The Raynox 250 is a diopter 8 and gives a maximum focusing distance of
109mm, I may have been better with the Raynox 150, that has a diopter
of 4.8 and gives a maximum focusing distance of 210mm.
--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
