OMG. That must be a little TV set above the LCD screen. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > What's wrong with it? > > Well, it doesn't have an optical viewfinder for one..... > > At least that's according to the UK magazine 'Digital SLR User' that > reviewed the K-x in its December 2009 issue. Surely they couldn't be > wrong. Could they? > > See this link: > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/K-x.jpg > > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > > > > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:29 -0400, "Steven Desjardins" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Ok, so we're all having fun with the inexpensive little Pentax that >> has this annoying habit of producing fine images. Why is that? Is >> the sensor and electronics that much better? I'm just curious. It's >> been a while since one of the low end cameras caused such a fuss. >> (The colors have been an amusing touch as well.) >> >> -- >> Steve Desjardins >> >> -- > -- > > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
