On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Bruce Dayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> My reading of the DPReview K-x review seems that it is better.  They
> have never been too kind on Pentax jpg rendering engines in the past,
> but seeemed to think it was fine for the K-x.

I dont know why. I shoot 99% jpg and other than my istD i have no
complaints of the jpg's. The K10D stuff is fine, to me anyway

Dave
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxkx/
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Monday, February 1, 2010, 11:56:33 AM, you wrote:
>
> NDW> Okay, I have another question concerning the KX.
>
> NDW> Is the JPG rendering of the KX any better than the K100Super?
>
> NDW> I never liked the quality of the JPGs straight out of the K100S.
>
> NDW> --
> NDW> ~Nick David Wright
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to