What is the difference between the Z-1p and MZ-S? I have noticed that the MZ-S gives a little bit darker, more saturated slides - like pro calibre Nikons used to do. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: P�l Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 13. tammikuuta 2002 14:03 Aihe: Re: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) >Bruce wrote: > > >>You know, it is an interesting thing, that perhaps there is really >>something to the precision of the meter. I find it curious that none >>of the advertising from any of the main makers (Pentax, Nikon, Canon, >>Minolta) ever make any claims over the precision and consistency of >>their meters. They all talk about the capabilities (color >>sensitivity, 5000 sensors, low light, etc.) but they don't talk about >>the quality of the meter. Is it because it can't be measured very >>well or demonstrated or ??? > > >No. Its because it is a feature taken for granted. All meters are basically >precise. There might be some differences in calibrations; eg. like between >the Z-1p and MZ-S. Anyway, all the current Pentaxes offers ultra-precise >meters. > >P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
