I shot and posted this a couple of days ago. The Pentax version isn't
that horrible.
http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20tutu.html
I still want to replace my two zoom kit with something better, because
of it. but in bright light so you can stop down a bit it's not that bad
in a pinch.
Larry Colen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 06:36:22PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
I have a Tamron 28-200 that is just a terrible lens.
It was one of the first, if not the first, lens I bought for my
K100. I picked it up at B&H for a lot less than I expected. After I
got my 18-250, I was having problems with the 18-250 misreading the
focal length and had to send it in for repair. The 28-200 was so bad I
used the Pentax 28-80 I had gotten in the meantime and would crop
rather than use the 28-200.
I'm very happy with the 18-250 as a "ready for anything" lens.
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
