Hi Shel,

>No need to apologize, but it's gratefully accepted.  It's easy to
>misconstrue intent when we communicate in this manner, and considering
>that I often kid around on this list, it's even easier to understand
>your response.  Just be glad I'm not Mafud <vbg>.

Trust me, I'm glad.

>
>It's a tough subject to tackle because there are so few things of
>outward appearance that can tell the story.  A messy, darkened house,
>lethargy (how does one photograph lethargy?), inattention to certain
>details of one's life, and so forth.  Anyway, it'll interesting to see
>what the first roll of film shows, and what it might indicate for future
>photographs.

Archetypal references suggest grainy black and white images of faceless 
individuals vs. the world, placed at odds with everything else, discarded 
and discordant. It would be only too easy to go for these shots. Truly 
recording depression is not an easy task, but you knew that from the 
outset. Off the tip of this head, I haven't a clue. Long and hard 
thoughts needed.

Good luck.

Cotty

_______________________________________________________
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads 
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to