Bruce Dayton wrote:
I ran across this exchange recently and it caused me to do some
thinking:
http://photo.net/wedding-photography-forum/00SlvT
I have many of the same feelings as this guy presented. When I look
at much of the current work being shown, especially on photo.net
galleries, I see heavy handed manipulation being the norm and also
being judged very positively.
Anyway, some interesting fodder for discussion for those who care to
take a read. The thread discussion improves further down than near
the top -but you do have to read the initial post.
He's kind of a dick:
"but compared to an amateur using a Rebel XSi and kit lens..."
"It seems like the only shot a wedding photographer has at succeeding is
to either do business with high rollers who appreciate the intrinsic
beauty of a well-crafted image by a master; or photoshopping every image..."
and also refers to himself as a "master"
Honestly I don't think he has an argument.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
