Actually, my preference is a more subdued version such as the lighting of my original post. The sky was distractingly bright, however, and ultimately brought it down as you see it in the re-do. The versions posted since have all been in response to suggestions from the LIST. Also, fun to diddle with.
Jack --- On Thu, 1/8/09, Tim Øsleby <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Tim Øsleby <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: PESO: Hageman Barn > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009, 11:12 AM > NOW, I have seen the original :-) > > The redo is an improvement. The lines needs some space to > "breathe". > > It is your shot. But if it where mine, then I would have > tried taking > the best of both versions. > The framing of the redo, combined with a lesser boost of > the colours. > In the redo, the foreground wins the battle of my > attention. > Hope this feedback makes sense. > > -- > MaritimTim > > 2009/1/7 Jack Davis <[email protected]>: > > Gray, raw, dim day that seemed to suit this barn well. > Was probably a little darker day than it appears. > > I shot it because it's a barn. Have no other > treason. > > > > Jack > > > > All comments welcome > > > > > > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=371 > > > > K20D, DA 16...@28mm, f/8, 1/90s, ISO 200 > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
