Looks very good at 8 x 10", and at 16 x 20". but at 30 x 40" (twice my
screen size) it gets pretty noisy in the background (black).
I'm impressed.
Joseph McAllister
Lots of gear, not much time
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
On Jan 6, 2009, at 00:36 , Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi Margus,
Yes, I think of the K20D as a very capable camera too. See here a
nice ISO
3200 shot:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/KXX20626.jpg
Just a straight conversion from RAW (full frame). You can add noise
ninja and/or sharpening at your leisure.
Dario
----- Original Message ----- From: "Margus Männik" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 2:03 AM
Subject: Another Dark Side
Have been busy by testing some cameras again. My this month
favorite is
massive, but handy, has probably even too many megapixels, but the
resolution is really stunning, takes pictures at ISOs we really don't
need, but the image is damn clean... after all it costs way too
much, but
gives a nice image of what (much more affordable) digital SLRs will
be in
future.
Nikon D3x with Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 G lens
(ISO1600, 1/60s, f/4.0, handheld, WB: tungsten, scene lighted by
bluish-white desk lamp, JPEG from camera resized in PS without any
corrections)
1/5 of original size:
http://home.uninet.ee/~margus02/peso/D3X_0405_20p.jpg
100% detail:
http://home.uninet.ee/~margus02/peso/D3X_0405_detail.jpg
PS, the more I test expensive cameras, the more I see, that K20D is
actually a very capable piece of equipment.
BR, Margus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
