Ewwwwww... A FF fisheye on a tiny 4/3 sensor? Thats a semi fisheye which is about as appealing to me as getting semi-laid.
JC O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 5:24 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: ANY M42 DSLR rumors (yet)? I'd rather use the M42 lenses for landfill than placate the incessant noise. But no, I was out shooting a little while ago, Pentax Fish-Eye-Takumar 17mm f/4 on M42->FourThirds adapter, and having a good time with it. I don't need an aperture actuator or screw mount body ... either of those things is a waste of development money. G On Nov 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Scott Loveless wrote: > Ooh! I've got it! A Digital Auto 110 with a 4/3 sensor and > interchangeable mounts for 4/3, 110 and M42 lenses. And a little auto > actuator bar thingy for the M42 lenses so JCO will STFU. > > On 1 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
