If a used K10D isn't an option and you won't trip over the small buffer, the K200D is an excellent choice at that price.
-Adam On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > The cost of the K200D has dropped here in OZ recently so that it is now > very competitive with "entry level" cameras from other makers (about > $A560 body only). I had been aiming at a K20D but am now seriously > considering the K200. > > I'm aware of the small buffer (Adam has noted this on numerous > occasions) but that doesn't really bother me as I don't have much need > for continuous shooting. Another reason for considering the K200D is > that > the considerably lower price than the 20D means that the 12-24 zoom I've > lusted after might become a reality.... > > Anyway, I'd be interested in any thoughts from anyone who has a K200D, > particularly the extended dynamic range performance and shake reduction. > Or anything else. > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > > > -- > > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an > unladen european swallow > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
