Almost, but not exactly.
You mentioned Bush and his responsibility for the loss of rights (placing his handlers
under his monker). It's hard to take the politics out of a mention of public
officials. (By politics I mean activities that occur in gov't, not party activities.)
I tried to simply contrast the unfounded accusation of loss of rights to real losses.
Though I brought in other figures, it was to clarify facts as opposed to inuendo.
In that it was in context.
I don't view C vs L as name-calling. They're general classifications that have a
common understanding and were only used to make a point clear.
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:08:57 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The New French Anti-Photography Law
Ah see, you've turned my comments into something they were not: not
political, not aimed at Bush but at what he and his inner circle have done to
the nation. We may ~never~ know how far this thing has gone.
The observation was aimed more at those "handling" Bush than at him.
**But I see you couldn't discuss what I wrote in context. You just had to
turn it into a "conservative" Vs. "liberal" name calling shooting war.
I won't play.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
.
-----------------------
"Edith Keiler must die."
Spock, Star Trek, "City on the Edge of Forever", c. 1930
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
