On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: > Best nonsequiter I've read in a while.
Non sequitur? What doesn't follow, pray tell? For the annoyance of the rest of the group, here's your original message: > Discussion about SUVs tends to be oriented > around lack of efficiency and energy consumption. > That is, > they're a luxury which should be controlled. > So how much does the luxury of photography add to > environmental pollution? > Or, even less-noticed, the semiconductor industry? > > Those who target SUVs will, when their task is complete, just pick > another target. Because the movers and shakers (not all of the > followers) in this world view are from a Marxist persuasion. They > hate things like private property and class success. And this is my smart-ass response, which just took your environmentalists-are-marxists premise, plus your suggestion that they'll come after photography, to its own ridiculous end: > >Watch out! We're coming after your MZ-S next! We'll replace it with a > >K1000 that you'll have to check out from the community equipment case > >every time you need it. It will come with your choice of M50/2 or > >35-80/5.6 non-SMC. Choice of film is Konica B&W or Kodak MAX, 6 frame > >rolls. > > > >:-) > > > >Being aware of your place in society and how it affects others has > >nothing to do with being leftist or hating private property. > > > >BTW, as evidence of how SUVs are evil, I present the many pictures of > >Taliban riding on Toyotas 4x4 we all have seen in the last few months. A most appropiate answer if you ask me. But what do I know, I drive a Civic. Cheers, j - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
