On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
> ... This worked for me. Suggestions for quality or speed  
> improvements are
> most welcome ...


I used to scan a lot of film ... probably up to five rolls of film a  
week, selectively ... and it is *always* time consuming, tedious and  
difficult to get top notch results. I've done it with scanners, with  
macro setups, etc etc etc.

Most of the professionals I've talked to in the past year are now  
outsourcing this work to ScanCafe (http://scancafe.com/). The results  
look very good, and at $190 to scan a thousand negatives ($240 for a  
thousand slides), it is great time and money savings.

I now only scan a few frames a year at most as I explore my film  
archives. For that level of endeavor, I use the Nikon Coolscan IV ED  
and Vuescan software to capture the image data. I do any required  
editing in Lightroom and Photoshop CS2.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to