Pooping in you own nest? Stupid thing to do. I prefer pooping in the neighbours well.
MaritimTim 2008/5/22 AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/5/21 Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Underexposing also gives more ISO noise, >> so this makes it a trade off situation between noise or fringing. >> Life ain't easy. The best thing is often to avoid the highlights. > > Life ain't easy. :-) > > In my opinion, the most salient point is as you say, to avoid the > highlights. Or perhaps even better, to contemplate the psychologial > implications of an unbendable urge to photograph backlit twigs at > f/2.8. I'd say the disposition of Fotozone looks unhealthy... :-) > > It is also worth noting that Fotozone have no mention of even > considering the same properties for comparable lenses from Nikon and > Canon. I've checked. And the sample photos does not include scenes > where PF may emerge. Until the next test of a similar lens from the > big two, I guess it's better to think that this property is something > hitherto unknown to Fotozone, and that a DA* attached to a K10D from > Pentax just happened to be the first lens/camera combo they made such > considerations for. If they ignore PF testing for other brands in the > future, however, they'll pretty much be as the ornithologist would > say, pooping in their own nest. :-) > > Jostein > > > > -- > http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ > http://alunfoto.blogspot.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- MaritimTim -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
