Thanks Frank. My inital take was the same as yours. I picked this one as the first post because I thought seeing her face was important. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Jan 26, 2008 5:50 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Today, in Starbucks: > > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6881325 > > Okay, I looked at Portait II yesterday, and only got around to looking > at this one today, and I ~by far~ prefer this one. > > Her face is obscured in the second one, and one can't tell that she's > texting on her phone. Honestly, I can't see the aggravation in the > second one. > > Seeing her face in this one gives me a much better idea of what's up. > There's a look of despondency on her face that tells me much more than > seeing her fiddling with a cellphone. > > I seem to be in the minority on this one, though... > > ;-) > > cheers, > frank > > > > > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
