On Dec 8, 2007 9:25 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been using it for a few weeks. A very nice lens: solidly made > and excellent IQ. It's a bit longer focal length range than I use on > average and bulkier than I usually carry around for casual picture > taking, but a fine addition to the kit.
Thanks Some members of that other forum speak highly of it, but at the same time a lot speak lowly of the 16-50 F2.8, so i thought i'd ask. They seem to think the 50-135 is nice and sharp. I could use this lens, i think. Most of my equine shots are in the 135 to 150 range anyway, so it might work out. O\Nice day today, maybe some B&W winter stuff and test my Sigma 300 F4 and 1.4c tele in decent light to see if the AF problems are more poor light related. Dave > > Godfrey > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
