On Nov 23, 2007 10:02 PM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave. > > The one thing the teacher of the basic portriat class i took this > spring kept saying, was that when taking ones portrait, it is about > the face, the look. Any imperfections should be there in the photo. > Thats who they are.
I agree, but my "models" bitch & moan about looking old (to which I reply "You are old" :-) > Made sense to me. > > However its is a sharp lens is'nt it.:-) Very. Here's a 100% crop from one shot: <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9639-crop.jpg> Cheers, Dave > On 11/23/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did some portraits of my parents this evening & I have to say that > > the 77 Ltd., for all it's good points, is a very unflattering lens for > > shooting people with a less than perfect complexion. > > > > Every wrinkle, pore, blemish etc. is rendered in razor sharp detail. > > > > :-) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave > > > > /observation -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
