These are the pages Adam is refering to:

KAF mount
<http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/technology/K-mount/Kaf.html>

KAF2 mount
<http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/technology/K-mount/Kaf2.html>

Cheers,

Dave

On 8/16/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim, look at Boz's site. The Pentax contact layout uses 6 pins as a
> coded max/min aperture info(6 bit digital code, 3 bits for max aperture,
> 3 bits for minumum), one to indicate whether or not the lens set to A
> and one as a signal line. The latter only exists on F or later mount
> lenses and KAF and later mount bodies and is the only contact involved
> in any communication between the lens chip and the body (the mount
> itself is ground). The two pins inside the mount on KAF2 bodies are
> power for Power Zoom and SDM lenses.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> jim wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:36:01 -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Not a pin as such no. Camera comnunication with lens is some form of serial 
> > protocol.
> > The DIGITAL pin I believe is power for the lens chip. The r3, r2 and r1 
> > contacts are for the serial bus of some form.
> > A1 and A2 aren't used tho these new SDM lenses may use these pins as well 
> > (focus?)
> > Info passed would be lens type number, focal length, zoom position , MTF 
> > and what ever else pentax has decided to add.
> > Covering one digital pin will kill all the above info transfer so chances 
> > are lens won't auto focus either.
> >
> > I cannot prove any of the above unless some one has a multi input logic 
> > analyser and data logger.
> > Got all of this from pulling apart a sigma lens, using a logic probe and 
> > some guess work.
> >
> > james
> >
> >
> >> Isn't there a pin/contact/whatever somewhere on the teleconverter
> >> that you could cover with tape so that it did NOT pass focal-length
> >> information?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to