Tom C. wrote: > Besides, arguments will then shift to > "What did the author really mean?". It'll be like interpreting the > constitution.
Tom, I know you were being tongue-in-cheek, but I didn't mean we should get the book for the words, but for the pictures. Just so we could say things like, "look at the picture on page 577 and tell me if you think it would have been taken that way with a zoom lens, and whether it would have improved the picture...I think it would have ruined it." I see it as a sort of chapbook of examples...so we'll all be looking at the same thing when we comment on something, and so that it will actually be possible to use examples in discussions. --Mike, Catherder - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
